Chancellor Admits Challenge to Winning $398 Million College Bond in November

Grossmont-Cuyamaca's Cindy Miles says both bond and state tax hikes are needed for district.

Chancellor Cindy Miles says she’s aware of the difficulty of winning a $398 million bond election in her Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District.

The college board voted 5-0 Tuesday afternoon to place the bond—a property tax increase—on the Nov. 6 ballot alongside the governor’s statewide tax initiative.

 “The reality is that both are sorely needed,” Miles said. “The governor’s tax initiative would protect us against further class cuts. The bond would provide the buildings, technology and infrastructure to meet students’ learning needs for the next two decades.”

The board cited the need for expanded career training facilities, veterans’ centers to assist former and active-duty military and updating aging classrooms, infrastructure and technology systems.

If approved, the typical East County homeowner would be assessed less than $40 each year, the district said. The bond measure is being sought under the provisions of Proposition 39, which prohibits use of the funds for operations, administrator salaries or pensions.

In voting for the bond election, the East County college board cited the need for expanded career training facilities, veterans’ centers to assist former and active-duty military, and updating aging classrooms, infrastructure and technology systems.

The ballot measure will be placed before about 230,000 voters residing in the East County cities and communities located within the college district, which stretches from the East County cities of El Cajon, La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Santee to the Imperial County and Mexican borders.  To pass, the measure requires approval by at least 55 percent support of the votes cast.

Bill Garrett, president of the board, said that as the result of drastic cuts in state funding, the bond measure is the most realistic option for the district to be able to build and maintain facilities that meet the educational and vocational training needs of East County.

Money from the new bond measure would continue work on renovations and upgraded facilities at the Grossmont and Cuyamaca college campuses that began after voters in 2002 approved Proposition R, a $207 million bond measure.

“What’s important to understand is that Proposition R just got us started,” Garrett said. “Let’s take that next step. We still have a lot of work to do with renovating old buildings and improving the technology infrastructure. This bond measure will move us forward.”

He said independent audits of Prop. R funds and the monitoring by a citizens bond oversight committee—mandates that would be observed under a new bond— have proven the district is a trustworthy steward of public dollars.

The bond measure is the result of a two-year comprehensive needs assessment and planning process based on an educational master plan that will guide the district for the next decade and beyond. A facilities master plan identifying more than $600 million in facility needs grew out of that planning process.

The facilities master plan highlighted numerous building, technology and sustainability needs at the two campuses, which enroll about 30,000 students. Grossmont College was built 50 years ago, and has 14 original buildings that are badly in need of repairs and don’t serve today’s technology requirements.

Cuyamaca College opened in 1978, and many of its buildings, roads, mechanical systems and fixtures are no longer adequate to serve the campus and its students.

In addition to technology upgrades, energy-efficiency measures are needed as a way to reduce operational costs and to direct the savings to classroom instruction.

“This is not just about buildings—it’s about education,” Miles said. “It’s the educational needs of the community that drive the district’s plans.”

James Davis August 08, 2012 at 08:32 PM
Given the recent news in the VOSD regarding PUSD's HORRENDOUS deal/bond measure, I think people are going to look long and hard at the details for this one before voting.
Batman August 08, 2012 at 09:17 PM
But the lottery will provide money for everything.
Lemongrovelocal August 09, 2012 at 05:43 AM
I pay $223.58 on my annual property taxes towards bonds and props of which $39.44 goes to Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, $75.38 to my local school district, 78.37 to Grossmont Union HSD, $25.66 to Grossmont Healthcare and the remainder to the San Diego County Water Authority. As a tax payer, I'm maxed out! I realized they have "needs" but so do a lot of other schools, agencies and businesses who are making do with the little resources they have. The carpet at my workplace is held together with duct tape for crying out loud. My vote will be no!
F. Dunn August 09, 2012 at 05:37 PM
Nope, uh-uh, nein.
Mary August 09, 2012 at 06:39 PM
I’m all for not increasing class sizes in the elementary grades, but I believe high schools and colleges should be able to increase their size to fit demand. I’m all for maintaining the school infrastructure, but I don’t think new buildings are needed in this time of recovery from our severe economic recession. I don’t need to know what the needs are for the next 20 years, let’s get thru the next five and see if we can better afford new buildings. I don’t think anyone would argue with an increase that is reasonable, but don’t try to build an empire in desperate times.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »