Poll: Is Mitt Romney Right About Poor Quality of ‘New Media’ Coverage?

GOP hopeful says he misses the days of two or more sources per story, with at least one named.

Mitt Romney, the GOP presidential front-runner with a La Jolla beach home being remodeled, would like to renovate online media coverage as well. In a talk Wednesday at the American Society of Newspaper Editors meeting in Washington, Romney said: “In some of the new media, I find myself missing the presence of editors to exercise quality control. ... I miss the days of two or more sources for a story—when at least one source was actually named.” Is Romney right in his critique of “new media”?  Or has he left out free-press considerations?

Things I Learned April 06, 2012 at 02:33 AM
Still don't understand Romney's concern about the lack of basic fact-checking and unsourced spin presented as "news" instead of an in-kind contribution to Obama 2012: http://poorrichardsnews.com/post/20412793566/it-begins-media-smears-ann-romney-suggests-she
Doug Curlee April 06, 2012 at 03:57 AM
komfort.. you'vre been told what caused the blackout.. you just don't want to accept it..a mistake made by a worker over in the desert caused the surge that eventually dominoed the system, causing overloads and a shutdown.. exactly what mistake he made is still being looked at.. but the overall cause is what it was.. deal with it.. doug
Vincent Wallgren, Jr. April 06, 2012 at 03:38 PM
No. The term "new media" can but translate to the internet; which, at it's essence, is the single greatest advancement to the dissemination of information since the introduction of the printing press. While I'd hardly consider Tweeter, FB or MS to be "media," they could be seen as an ad-hoc version of a library's Dewey Decimal System; providing cyber space links to information sources. I suspect that status-quo, flip-flopping politicians (such as Romney) most fear "new media" exposure of their past duplicitous, politically specious pandering.
BP April 06, 2012 at 06:40 PM
When people are free to disseminate lies and/or opinion, to a large audience under the guise of "news", it is not a matter of "free press", it is irresponsible at least, and criminal at worst. Without the possibility of attributable verification or named sources it often simply becomes divisive noise and propoganda. There is nothing wrong with lending your opinion to a subject, and as they say, you are entitled to your own opinion but not to your own facts.
Vincent Wallgren, Jr. April 06, 2012 at 07:51 PM
Very true, BP. Regardless the endeavor, absent absolute objective truth, the outcomes can never be righteous or just.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »