.
Feedback

Puppy Mill Protest Fallout: Ex-Owner of Pet Store in High-Stakes Fight with Grossmont Center

Mall sues Richard Fuller for $800,000 over broken lease. Fuller countersues for $400,000, saying shopping center didn't halt weekly protests that led him to close store.

A month after Pet Works shut down at Grossmont Center in the wake of 22 months of puppy mill protests, the mall sued owner Richard Fuller for $800,000 and attorney fees to recover money owed on its 12-year lease.

Then on March 1, alleging that Grossmont Center didn’t protect the pet store from the weekly protests, Fuller countersued for $400,000.

Court documents in the civil case reveal that Fuller, an 82-year-old San Diego resident, blamed the protests led by Sydney Cicourel as causing loss of revenue and eventually the shutdown—even though Fuller said in mid-December that he was closing mainly thanks to the poor economy.

In fact, Fuller modified his lease in January 2010 to reflect his lower income as a result of the protests, says a court filing by his attorney, Philip Dyson of La Mesa.

“The decrease in rent was not able to make up for the severe lost profits and revenues Fuller was experiencing due to the protesters,” Dyson wrote in a cross complaint filed in East County Superior Court.

Dyson wrote that “the successful protests of the animal rights group”—known then as San Diego Stop Puppy Mills—robbed Pet Works of almost all sales.

“Fuller was forced, due to the breaches of the lease on the part of Grossmont Center, and due to ‘civil commotion’ … to shut and abandon the Pet Works store … and to stop paying rent under the lease,” Fuller said in a nine-page filing dated Feb. 24, 2011.

Grossmont Center—represented by Cynthia Stelzer of the San Diego firm Kimball, Tirey and St. John—originally sued Fuller on Jan. 12, a little over a month after Pet Works closed. The mall sued Fuller $400,000 for breach of lease and $400,000 for breach of lease guaranty. Attorney Stelzer also asked for costs of the suit and “reasonable attorneys’ fees.”

The mall, acting as landlord, leased 2,747 square feet of space near the shopping center’s south end in January 2003, signing a lease that was to expire in January 2015. The annual rent started at $59,000 but rose over time. Grossmont Center also charged Fuller (and his wife, Joanne) a “marketing assessment” of $5,494 a year.

Attorney Dyson denied the mall’s allegations in a Feb. 24 “answer” filing on behalf of Richard Fuller Inc.

In Dyson’s countersuit, he argued that Grossmont Center had agreed to keep the common area outside Pet Works in a “neat, clean and orderly condition” and that the mall had the “right at any time to exclude and restrain any person from the use or occupancy of the Common Area.”

As well, Dyson wrote, the mall promised to “provide security officers for the Common Area.”

Dyson said Fuller had the right to quit the lease if it couldn’t operate because of “civil commotion.”

But starting in early spring 2009, Dyson said, Pet Works became the target of picketing and protests alleging the store sold “puppy mill” dogs.

Dyson wrote:

These protestors and picketers stood in front of the Pet Works store with banners and placards which dissuaded customers from buying pet supplies and animals. … The customers blocked the common sidewalk in front of the store and yelled at customers. … The protestors further left placards and signs against the windows … obscuring the puppies, kittens and other animals for sale … and further preventing patrons and customers from walking into the shop.”

Fuller immediately alerted mall management to the disturbances, Dyson wrote, saying security would give protesters written restrictions. But Dyson said security didn’t routinely meet the protesters.

On Sept. 18, 2010, Fuller wrote mall officials that if security didn’t clear the sidewalks of protesters, “Fuller would consider Grossmont Center in breach of lease,” Dyson wrote.

No trial has been set in the case assigned to Judge Joel R. Wohlfeil, according to court records. But many of Fuller’s allegations would be disputed—especially by Cicourel, whose group is now called Companion Animal Protection Society.

In a phone interview Thursday, Cicourel called the court arguments “ridiculous.”  She said protests on private property, especially in shopping centers, won U.S. Supreme Court approval in a 1980 decision called Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins.

“We made efforts to never block the sidewalk—and did not block the view of the windows,” she said.

In fact, when she saw members of her weekly protest group harassing customers, “I removed them” and banished them from the group, she said.

Cicourel said she knew the fire codes and complied with Grossmont Center’s requests.

“The mall was very receptive to both of us [the store and protest group],” she said. “We always abided by what [mall security] said.”

Cicourel also reacted Thursday to news that La Mesa’s city attorney warned the City Council about “expensive and protracted litigation” if the city passed an ordinance similar to West Hollywood’s to restrict the animals pet stores can sell.

When told that city staff was instructed only to “monitor” the year-old West Hollywood law, Cicourel lashed out at the council.

She likened the action to events in Wisconsin and the move by Republicans lawmakers to pass an anti-union bill without public notice. She was upset that she hadn’t been notified of the report by City Attorney Glenn Sabine.

“If this is government by the people, you have to have the people present,” Cicourel said.  “We didn’t have a chance to have a discussion with” city officials. “I am frustrated and disappointed.”

She blamed the council for being “pro-business,” and suggested “this was completely political” when it voted in mid-December to have city staff study an anti-puppy mill ordinance.

“I thought all along that they weren’t going to vote [for an ordinance],” she said. “I thought this was the plan all along.”

Meanwhile, Josh McClintock of El Cajon, one of the customers of Pet Works who gained notoriety with his sick Boston terrier Minne Moo, said in a phone interview Friday that he would be moving late this month to Seattle, where he’s found another job.

McClintock, a disabled Marine who served in Iraq, said he and his wife, Erin, had decided not to sue Fuller for veterinarian costs involved with Minnie Moo, who died Feb. 5 from what Cicourel’s group says were remnants of the dog’s puppy mill upbringing.

“I kind of want to let it rest,” he said. “My dog is gone.”

He said he’s grateful for the donations he’s received so far in the wake of a televised press conference outside the La Mesa police station Jan. 27, but also received a pledge from Cicourel to handle the balance of veterinarian costs.

Cicourel said she was waiting for other donations, but expected to donate between $2,000 and $2,300.

McClintock still misses Minnie Moo and “not hearing my puppy,” but will seek another therapy canine after he’s settled in Seattle.

“We’ll be rescuing another dog,” he said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from La Mesa-Mount Helix Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Craig Maxwell May 19, 2013 at 05:10 pm
That's the gist of it, both of you. Obama differs from his predecessors not in degree but inRead More kind--qualitatively, not quantitatively. He is our first, true-blue presidential ideologue.
Status Quo May 19, 2013 at 11:15 am
That is correct 'Bat', pathetic attempts by followers of the present charlatan President - keepRead More trying to make, this some sordidly type of "racist" issue... wholly non-existent. In other words, affixing blame in search of a problem, for perceived political gain. The fact is, our President Barack Obama is a bad manager, hiring lousy managers in positions demanding excellence, affording no quarter for ineptitude and deceit! Promotion of figures and public servants as reward for ineptitude, should be punished by laws in-place and not shuffled around to administer more egregious miss-management. Lying to Americans has been perpetrated, by whom is in need of the reveal. The facts are inconsistent with, what has been revealed thus far. On the Muslim issue of the President's proclivity for apologies, it is appeasement at the least and inherent bowing to outrageous power at worst. The optics(hate that word in politics), are not good for America.
Batman May 19, 2013 at 10:36 am
Face it folks, you elected the wrong guy, twice. John Mc Cain is not that impressive, Mitt Romney isRead More a little better, but both of them are leaps and bounds above Mr Obama. At least they are both Americans. Questions have been raised about Obama's place of birth. Where he was born is not the issue. The issue is he is not one of us.
Debra Gilly May 21, 2013 at 08:51 am
Outrageous!
Status Quo May 19, 2013 at 11:18 am
'Bat'... At great individual cost, to be passed on to the consumer.
Batman May 18, 2013 at 04:02 pm
Perhaps the IRS is now in the identity theft business.
Things I Learned May 18, 2013 at 02:56 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859#Carrington_Super_Flare
Things I Learned May 18, 2013 at 02:55 pm
http://www.space.com/21205-powerful-solar-flare-earth-fallout.html?cmpid=514648
Things I Learned May 18, 2013 at 02:54 pm
"A huge explosion on the sun will deal Earth a glancing blow today (May 17) but should not poseRead More a threat to the planet, scientists say. The sun storm erupted late Tuesday (May 14) during a powerful solar flare — the fourth unleashed by a single sunspot in just 48 hours — and hurled a massive cloud of charged particles out into space at millions of miles an hour."
Status Quo May 19, 2013 at 10:34 am
Why yes 'TIL', I do remember a more vibrant. lively and robust Patch site in the region! Now theRead More Mommy Bloggers are happy, happy, happy*. Patch may or may not be getting what they want, but the tourist rag they are producing is fun for the Mommy Bloggers - they adapt so well. In the early few days of the "transition"... I had prepared comments on positives and negatives, as well suggestions to make San Diego region Patch workable... all for naught and logical lack of interest. Recently... voices of the Grape Nuts... on the left side have called oppositional views "unpatriotic"... though discordant, it isn't like people were allowed to die without expedient help or laws being abridged, abrogated or circumvented. Cry's of "slander" are incorrect, but doesn't prevent those more discordant voices from uttering the tones. I remember when Free Speech reigned in America 'TIL'... I do? Sure the chicks were nice... until they aren't. *ala Phil Robertson
Komfort May 17, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Komfort May 17, 2013 at 02:22 pm
I used to come here for the chicks.
Craig Maxwell May 15, 2013 at 10:35 am
Just imagine how much tax-payer money's been blown on Art's drinking junkets over the last quarterRead More century (and how many sidewalks have been soiled).
Linda McCreight May 16, 2013 at 09:06 am
Rides4Neighbors is a great service. Because I work and travel a lot I cannot always get my motherRead More to her appointments and the folks at Rides4Neighbors are always so helpful and my mom really praises the drivers for their help and friendliness.
JWatson April 20, 2013 at 10:38 am
Mark, they were making that U-Turn to drop off their elementary school children in the red zoneRead More anyway....so the no U-Turn sign kills two birds with one stone: no bad U-Turns + no parking in the red zone. And, we are talking about elementary school children, so safety should have been all those parents first priority.
Mark Gregory Elliott April 18, 2013 at 03:12 pm
It is good to narrow the streets. Pedestrians are road kill in San Diego County. And if drivers doRead More not realize there is not enough room to make a U-turn, they need to retake the driving test instead of going over the curb. This is not rocket science people.
Komfort April 21, 2013 at 12:38 pm
Did S(he) tell you what was "shoddy" about his helping women with their choice?
Stuart Strenger April 20, 2013 at 02:48 pm
I've talked to God, and (S)he definitely supports a woman's right to choose whether she remainsRead More pregnant or not but disapproves of the shoddy way Dr. Gosnell ran his clinic. Surely you see the distinction as well. Medical malpractice is malpractice from any religious or ethical position. By the way, God also said (S)he supports gay marriage.
Komfort April 20, 2013 at 10:51 am
What does your God say about Kermit Gosnell and a woman's right to choose?